I'm just going to get this one out of the way. It's a stupid issue, and I wish it wasn't, but it is, so here we go!
A common belief, which is erroneous, is that feminists are against sluts. People tend to think that sluts impair the feminist movement. It makes a lot of sense; sluts are objectifying themselves! Sluts allow men to control them! Right?
Wrong! And here's why!
Feminism is about freedom of choice and bodily autonomy. Feminists saying that sluts impede the movement are impeding the movement themselves. Sluts are merely exercising their right to sexual freedom and expression (a.k.a. the whole point of feminism), so saying that sluts are a problem is actually anti-feminist.
Before I continue, let me just clarify what "slut" means to me. I'm using my own definition, and it's fairly common, but people have different definitions. To me, a "slut" is a woman who engages in casual sex. A slut is a promiscuous woman, and that's it.
Now for more explanation as to what slut-shaming is. Slut-shaming is the act of shaming someone for being a slut. It's pretty straight-forward. Here are some lovely examples:
- Girls these days have no self-respect
- Wow what a slut/whore
- Oh em gee she slept with this many guys
 |
| Easy A is an accurate portrayal of this |
You will usually find these in response to an image of a woman who is wearing revealing clothing. Instead of thinking positive things like "wow, good for you, you must feel free and confident!" people decide to think "wow, this chick has no respect for herself, cover yourself up you harlot". It's a stranger on the internet that you don't know personally, but she's showing her boobs! No self-respect!
The problem with this is that when you treat women like an "other" just for having sex, you make it okay for other people to treat these women badly and harm them. Slut-shaming is a problem because it leads to rape, sexual assault, and violence against women. These women are seen as less than human, so people (particularly men but it can go both ways) think they're justified in hurting them.
And do I even have to point out the blindingly obvious double standard here? If a guy goes out and has sex with ten girls, he's cool! He got laid! Awesome! But if a girl does the same thing, she's a slut and she's degrading herself. Shame!
A common argument in favour of slut-shaming is the whole safety issue. Having many different partners means that you are at more risk of getting an STD or getting pregnant or raped or some other horrible thing. I actually refuse to to believe that it's about safety at all. You can be ethical and smart about who you choose to sleep with. Give women a little more credit!
In my opinion, this is more about control and sexual snobbery. All I get out of slut-shaming is, "you are not having sex the way I would have sex, the way I think you should have sex, or the way I want you to have sex, so you deserve to be treated like garbage".
For the record, I wouldn't call myself a slut. I am as "pure" as the freshly fallen snow, and there's nothing wrong with that, either. There's nothing wrong with having sex, and there's nothing wrong with not having sex. It all depends on the individual. And what the individual does is nothing but their own business and anyone who is directly involved (i.e. their sexual partners). We need to put this sexual snobbery to rest and start accepting each other instead of knocking each other down.
 |
| A concise illustration of the openness spectrum and the problems with dichotomies. |
So there. That's slut-shaming. It's a bad thing. It's a crappy thing to do, and partaking in it doesn't make you a better person. It really doesn't. Trust me, I used to do it all the time, and I now see the error of my ways. Also, it's just a lot easier to let people do what they want!
- Carli_V